This month's guest blog is written by one of Insight's Associates, Ricky Coussins:
The
post war years saw little to recommend them to any time traveller. Rationing was still a part of daily
life. Spam and powdered egg was still on
most menus. Much of the nation’s major cities were still bombed out. Most of the population were struggling to
come to terms with a new world order in which the British Empire was beginning
to play an increasingly insignificant part.
But
someone somewhere was thinking about issues that concern modern marketers just
as actively now as they had begun to then.
A group of the great and the good known then (and now) as the Joint Industry Committee for National Readership Survey–
or JICNARS for short (catchy acronyms they had in those days) – was considering
how to provide useful information to advertisers about readers of their
publications. They decided that it would
be very helpful for advertisers to understand what their readership looked like
in terms of socio-economic characteristics.
This way they could match their advertising space purchases to those publications
and those readerships that they thought might be most likely to buy their
product (or service). That’s right. Someone, somewhere had invented the idea of
segmentation.
In order to make this entirely clear to those product
producers and advertisers, they decided that they would use alpha numeric
segmentation labels that would relate to a group of characteristics. So an A would be upper middle class and a B
would be middle class. The complete table looked a bit like this:
Social Grade
|
Social Status
|
Occupation
|
A
|
Upper middle class
|
Higher managerial, administrative or
professional
|
B
|
Middle class
|
Intermediate managerial, administrative or
professional
|
C1
|
Lower middle class
|
Supervisory or clerical and junior managerial,
administrative or professional
|
C2
|
Skilled working class
|
Skilled manual workers
|
D
|
Working class
|
Semi and unskilled manual workers
|
E
|
Those at lowest level of subsistence
|
State pensioners or widows (no other earners),
casual or lowest grade workers
|
It
was pretty revolutionary and very clever stuff.
In fact it was so interesting, clever and well thought out that nascent
marketers started to use these distinctions for other purposes. It had that
instant appeal of being memorable, exclusive (you had to know to what it
referred), logical and easy to understand once you were on the inside of
it.
And
what’s wrong with that? Nothing of
course if you are a new bright young marketer living in the ‘never had it so
good’ decade of the Beano and the Tiger, Radio Times and The Daily Sketch,
holidays in Clacton, plain talking horny handed machine fitters, and folks
running things ‘what know best for us’.
Those distinctions make a lot of sense for that social order.
The
problem is that people are still using these terms today. In the 21st century when
meritocracy rules, there is no machine to be a fitter for, Clacton holidays are
an interesting historical phenomenon, where is the relevance? So why do people
persist in referring to these segmentation characteristics?
Our
modern world is far too complex for such simple social divisions.
In
one weekend I might eat at a McDonalds with the kids, have a pint and a pie at
the local pub, take the family to a Harvester and then eat at the Complete
Angler at Bray. Yet each of those
organisations, if they’re not careful, will see me as a simple mono dimensional
code.
We
need to throw out the alpha numerics and replace them with other segmentation
models as smart, clever and insightful companies have been doing for more than
a couple of decades.
So
it’s time to begin to invent your own segments and segmentation criteria. Ones that recognise where the world is now
and where it is going and what that means to your customers and market
places. And we need to keep re-inventing
them to keep pace with the fast changing social dynamics.
And
if you are one of the all too many organisations still using these wholly
outdated JICNARS socio economic demographics for any marketing purpose, well
shame on you. The world is all now a
little too complex for that.
Don’t
believe me? Well just take a look around
your desk and tell me how many other tools you are using now which are more
than 60 years old. I rest my case.
Time,
boys and girls, to forget your ABC, because, as you know deep down, it’s never
as simple as that.
For more from Ricky, see his blog and the Coussins Associates Website.